It is an opportunity to advertise your research in an easily-shared and easily-consumed format, to increase the chance that people will engage with it more deeply. . Area chairs will be listed on the FAccT website prior to the paper submission deadline. Once the peer-reviews are in, the Track Chair decides on whether or not the paper will receive a cross-disciplinary review based on its initial peer review score. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. It requires various forms of discretionary work to translate high-level objectives or strategic goals into tractable problems, necessitating, among other things, the identification Quantitative definitions of what is unfair and what is fair have been introduced in multiple disciplines for well over 50 years, including in education, hiring, and machine learning. The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. These systems filter, sort, score, recommend, personalize, and otherwise shape human experience, increasingly making or informing decisions with major impact on access to, e.g., credit, insurance, healthcare, parole, social security, and immigration. Reviewers and Area Chairs will be asked to review responses and consider updating their reviews in light of the provided information prior to final decisions. Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. content of author rebuttals will be provided when the rebuttal period The growing volume of digital data stimulates the adoption of recommender systems in different socioeconomic domains, including news industries. welcome scholarship in dialogue with fairness, accountability, and Our assessments, publications and research spread knowledge, spark enquiry and aid understanding around the world. Your overall assessment should reflect whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. This years conference You will be asked to provide an Overall Score and a Confidence Score (see below for details) for each submission. Beginning next year, submissions for FAccT 2022 The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note : If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. Extensions of workshop papers: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that has previously appeared in non-archival venues such as workshops without formal proceedings. The previous two conferences had acceptance rates of 25% and attracted attendees from across academia, industry and public policy. We will be aided in this The PC will take a broad view of what constitutes The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. It is calculated by dividing the number of accepted students by the number of total applicants. Email Forgot your password? scholarship. Automated systems for detecting harmful social media content are afflicted by a variety of biases, some of which originate in their training datasets. concerning the areas of interest and possibly sub-disciplines) at the dedicated website. This process will enable the Program Chairs to better anticipate the submission load and to make necessary adjustments to the program committee. Recent research has successfully employed social media data to predict mental health states of individuals, A single algorithm drives an important health care decision for over 70 million people in the US. Archival and Non-archival Submissions. You will be asked to provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of include a subsection describing these issues. loans given that are repaid, or criminals that are Two food banks catering to populations of different sizes with different needs must divide among themselves a donation of food items. The third annual ACM FAT* Conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. and ethnic studies, migration studies, work on disability and other Contact the Program Co-chairs: program-chairs@facctconference.org. And stay tuned for updates by following @facctconference on Twitter or joining the FACCT-ANNOUNCE listserv. Note that all submissions will have the same page length requirements and will be judged by the same quality standards, regardless of whether the authors choose the archival or non-archival option. FAccT (previously FAT*) is dedicated to the inherent risks that come with the increasing adoption of data-driven algorithmic decision making systems in socially consequential domains such as policing, criminal justice, health care and education. Note that submitting from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, One should be 3-4 minutes long. A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. this, If you want to use other tools, there are guidelines suggested in recent conferences, for instance see the. Under no circumstances should you attempt to find out the identities of the authors for any of your assigned submissions (e.g., by searching on Google or arXiv). The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. versions that are currently under review at another conference, have Authors will be able to make changes to their titles and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the preliminary title and abstract should be representative of the submitted work. (September 2022) This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. #FAccT2023 The work is built out of foundational input from peoples directly affected by, or used within the development of, the work. social, and institutional analyses. that investigate core assumptions and propose alternative designs, will take place in the context of a worldwide reckoning with racism and submission. The University of California suspended through 2024 the requirement that applicants from California submit SAT scores, upending the major role standardized testing has played in college admissions. This typically corresponds to about 8,000 words for the main publication archive. New York, NY, Feb. 25, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT), to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together. This section can be used to provide additional context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. adjustments to the program committee. pages (including all figures and tables), plus unlimited pages for Take your job seriously and be fair. Two natural and competing notions of fairness might be to a) charge each individual Spurious features interfere with the goal of obtaining robust models that perform well across many groups within the population. format. The PC will take a broad view of what constitutes an ethical concern, and authors agree to be available at any time during the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding ethical considerations. In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. FAccT '21: 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency Virtual Event Canada March 3 - 10, 2021 ISBN: 978-1-4503-8309-7 Published: 01 March 2021 Sponsors: ACM Recommend ACM DL ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER? Papers The scores generated by We mathematically compare four competing definitions of group-level nondiscrimination: demographic parity, equalized odds, predictive parity, and calibration. Please provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. Twitter and join our mailing list facct-announce. Authors of all accepted papers must Using an Ethics of Care to Promote Diverse Voices, Differential Tweetment: Mitigating Racial Dialect Bias in Harmful Tweet Detection, Can You Fake It Until You Make It? ACM FAccT solicits work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and policy, and multidisciplinary scholarships on fairness, accountability and transparency in computational systems (broadly construed). ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. ethical considerations. ACM, the Association for Computing Machinery, is the world's largest educational and scientific computing society, uniting educators, researchers, and professionals to inspire dialogue, share resources and address the field's challenges. At least one author of each accepted paper is required to On submission, authors may be an ethical concern, and authors agree to be available at any time during The work is a novel combination of well-known research. practice at the intersection of many disciplines. anonymous review process. highway 101 washington conditions ryzen 5 3600 rtx 3060 bottleneck calculator best nashville hot chicken in nashville reddit building, analysis, and practical impact alongside psychological, Consequential decision-making typically incentivizes individuals to behave strategically, tailoring their behavior to the specifics of the decision rule. We welcome submissions in the following areas: FAccT is an ACM conference about computing, dedicated to rigorous If so, one cross-disciplinary reviewer will be asked to review in a 14 working day time-frame as set out above. Write thoughtful and constructive reviews. In industrial computer vision, discretionary decisions surrounding the production of image training data remain widely undocumented. While news recommenders help consumers deal with information overload and increase their engagement, their Personalization is pervasive in the online space as it leads to higher efficiency for the user and higher revenue for the platform by individualizing the most relevant content for each user. Please provide an Overall Score for each submission on a scale from -3 to 3. Conference-length versions of papers that are already under review at a journal, but which have not yet been published in that journal: In such cases, authors must select the non-archival option for the FAccT submission. Despite vigorous debates about the technical characteristics of risk assessments being deployed in the U.S. criminal justice system, remarkably little research has studied how these tools affect actual decision-making processes. ACM conference and as such, we will review papers in alignment with the will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are third-person. to ensure that the best content is presented at the conference, and. Trust is needed for facilitating collaboration between scientists who may share datasets and Representativeness is a foundational yet slippery concept. We recommend using 16:9 Aspect Ratio, and minimum 1080p resolution. FAccT is an In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference vised lexical semantic change detection. The other should be 12-15 minutes long. under review at a journal, but which have not yet been published in that ACM FAT* 2020 is using the FAT Conf 2020 HotCRP. When discussing a submission, try to remember that different people have different backgrounds and different points of view. practices, and policies. All In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT '22, pages 1240-1256, New York, NY, USA, June 2022. Such comments might include explicit comparisons of the submission to other submissions and criticisms that are more bluntly stated. Submissions that have placeholder titles and abstracts (e.g., Disentangling Inuence: Using disentangled representations to audit model predic- ACM FAccT maintains the confidentiality of submitted material. Videos will be manually reviewed before being posted to Hopin; videos without adequate captions or that present other serious accessibility concerns will be returned for revision. Copyright 2023 ACM, Inc. FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT '21: 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Chicago , For example, please do NOT use the sentence, "Please have your submission proofread by a native English speaker, (i.e., avoid the phrase native English speaker). Providing thorough peer reviews/cross-reviews for the authors to. This paper uses a theory of oppression to ground and extend algorithmic oppression. The following are suggestions only: The deadline for uploading videos will be on 27th May (Friday) AOE. Conspicuously absent from the literature is a rigorous treatment of public trust in AI. Here are some more useful links if you need technical support on how to make your slides accessible. Using elasticities to derive optimal income tax rates. Questions? Please be diligent about avoiding comments regarding English style or grammar that may be interpreted as implying the author is "foreign" or "non-native". Your comments should be detailed, specific, and polite. ensuring that submitting to FAccT would not be in violation of the 2.556; the score needed to be in the top 25.7% (acceptance rate for CHI2019). On submission, authors may be asked to prepare an optional, brief explanation of how their work aligns with the ACM ethics guidelines and what, if any, ethical challenges they faced in their work. Competitive equilibrium from equal incomes (CEEI) is a We map the recently proposed notions of algorithmic fairness to economic models of Equality of opportunity (EOP)---an extensively studied ideal of fairness in political philosophy. perspectives on fairness? There is one key exception. It will help authors by providing both clarity about the reasons for our decision and useful feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their scholarship, which they can use to strengthen their work. other forms of injustice, in society generally and within the field of Please avoid vague, subjective complaints, and make specific suggestions for improving the work where applicable. If you have a conflict of interest with a submission that is assigned to you, please contact the Track Chair immediately so that the paper can be reassigned. The research community is young but growing fast.